Corentin Cadiou
CNRS Researcher
Journées Galaxies ATCG | 2026
Left: Leclercq+17
Right: Galárraga-Espinosa+23
Bottom left: Ramsøy+21
Mpc to galactic scales
Right: Peng+10
Left: Zooniverse
Higher density | high mass \(\rightarrow\) redder galaxies
⚠️ cannot explain morphology/orientations!
Cluster-like
Void-like
Right: Peng+10
Left: Romanowsky&Fall 12
Higher density | high mass \(\rightarrow\) redder galaxies
⚠️ cannot explain angular momentum!
Cluster-like
Void-like
Distance to filament changes
Left: Kraljic,...CC+18 (GAMA)
Right: Laigle+18 (COSMOS)
See also Kuutma+17, Malavasi+17, Alpaslan+16 or O'Kane+24
Triple effect:
Small \(\perp\) alignment of halo spin/shape with filament axis
Left: Codis+18
Right: Ganeshaiah Veena+18
See e.g. Tempel+13 for measurement in observation
\(\perp\) filament
// filament
🚧 ¼ temporary conclusion 🚧
CW drives 1%-level effects?
How can we study this?
Sample \(M\) at fixed cosmic web
or sample cosmic web at fixed \(M\)
Storck, CC+25 / Bot. right: Aragon-Calvo 15
\( \pm 20\% \)!
🚧 ½ temporary conclusion 🚧
Local CW drives 20%-level effects!*
*for DM halos
Small \(\perp\) alignment of halo spin with filament
Genetically modified simulations: CC+22
comical to present at “Journées ATCG”
Environment perturbed on \(>\mathrm{Mpc}\) scales
Cosmic-web-scale information trickles to galactic scale \(\Rightarrow\) what's the messenger?
🚧 ¾ temporary conclusion 🚧
Local CW drives 20%-level effects!*
*for galaxies
So… effects of the CW on galaxy formation. Is it \(\ll 1\%\) or \(\gg 20\%\)?
So… effects of the CW on galaxy formation. Is it \(\ll 1\%\) or \(\gg 20\%\)?
Talk to Sabri Errachdi for more information!
2-3 “Cold flows” embedded in local cosmic web pancakes, feeding the galaxy
\(z=2.5, M_\star = 10^{12}\,M_\odot\); Danovich+12
Hints of detection of anisotropic extended cold emission
Excess of Ly\(\alpha\) in stacked images
\(3< z< 4\); Gallego+18
Ly\(\alpha\) radiation between quasar pairs; \( z\sim 3\); Herwig+24
Ly\(\alpha\), CIV and HeII emissions; Vayner+23
Ly\(\alpha\) is great, but hard to interpret
Other lines are great… but are we getting the right predictions?
Movies: from CC+26
Left: Mitchell, ... CC+20
Ly\(\alpha\)
H\(\alpha\)
CIII] 1906Å
[CIV] 1548Å
HeII 1640Å
Ly\(\alpha\) is great, but hard to interpret
Other lines are great… but are we getting the right predictions?
Movies: from CC+26
Left: Mitchell, ... CC+20
H\(\alpha\)
HeII 1640Å
Ly\(\alpha\)
🚧 Temporary conclusion 🚧
Predictions/interpretation of CGM obs.
may not be mature
[CIV] 1548Å
CIII] 1906Å
Effect of \(>\mathrm{Mpc}\) scale CW on galaxy well-established...
but likely massively underestimated
Corentin Cadiou — cadiou@iap.fr
How this manifest much less so. Theoretical uncertainties
remain on small-scale:
Prospects of observation of cosmic web/CGM interface: