Yuan-Sen Ting
The Ohio State University
Report on the Future of AI for the Mathematical and Physical Sciences (AST focused)
About 12 invitees per domain, about 60 in total
List of invitees for Astronomical Science (AST)
Andy Connolly (U Washington - Time Domain)
Stella Offner (UT Austin - ISM / Star Formation - CosmicAI)
Yuan-Sen Ting (Ohio State - Stellar Astrophysics / Galaxy Evolution)
Eric Ford (Penn State - Exoplanet)
Risa Weschler (Stanford - Local Group)
Brice Menard (Johns Hopkins - Science for AI)
List of invitees for Astronomical Science (AST)
Aggelos Katsaggelos (Northwestern - CS - SkAI)
Uros Seljak (Berkeley - Cosmology)
Ann Zabludoff (Arizona - Galaxy Evolution / Retrieval Systems)
Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro (CCA - Cosmology)
Benjamin Wandelt (CCA/John Hopkins - Reionization)
Peter Melchior (Princeton - Cosmology)
Salman Habib (Argonne - Cosmology - National Lab - SkAI)
Balancing institutional representation and subdomain expertise
Outcomes :

More details this afternoon
On Ongoing Dialogue between AI and MPS
AI for Science:
The MPS domains need AI for continued scientific progress
Science for AI:
AI research needs the MPS domains to continue the cycle of AI innovation and establish the science of AI
On Funding
The disruption caused by AI will require flexibility and thoughtful investment, including diverse funding streams to support interdisciplinary research on multiple scales
On Infrastructure
The rapid growth of AI across MPS requires robust AI infrastructure. We must bolster existing resources, such as NSF ACCESS, NAIRR, to ensure optimal access, agility, and portability.
On Robust AI
It is especially important for scientists to promote responsible AI and communicate honestly and effectively about its potential. This requires obtaining community-wide agreement on standards, benchmarks, and practices.
On Education (a session I chaired and led the writing)
Educating and training an AI+MPS workforce is essential to continued progress in both scientific discovery and AI innovation, which will require revisiting university education and upskilling faculty
Outcomes :

Now
AI for Astronomy - The Need
Investment in AI remains small compared to the amount spent already on instrumentation
Rubin Observatory and Roman Space Telescope will create a data deluge
A critical timing to maximize scientific returns from billion-dollar investments
Progress: More Robust Inference with Simulations
Revolutionizing high-stakes science through novel statistical methods via deep learning
Sharpened constraints in cosmology, gravitational waves, and exoplanet atmospheres, etc.
Simulation-Based Inference transforms the "inverse problem" - using generative models as a surrogate for likelihood / posterior
Bayesian statistical inferences without simplistic human-heuristic summary statistics (e.g., power spectrum)
Progress: Anomaly Detection
Real-time classification of transient events enables timely follow-up
Better distinction between planetary signals and stellar activity/noise for detecting Earth-like planets
Addressing the astronomical "needle in the haystack" problem
Multi-messenger and multi-modal (time series, images, spectra) data integration
Progress: Workflow Optimization
Data processing : e.g., cosmic ray rejection
Image reconstruction and turbulence prediction for adaptive optics - e.g. for extreme large telescopes
Significantly reduce costs for ground and space-based telescopes
Reinforcement learning for instrumentation control
to align multi-mirror telescopes and interferometric arrays
Progress: Simulation Acceleration
Neural network emulators replace expensive components,
such as sub-resolution physics for multi-scale simulations
Maintaining physical accuracy while achieving numerical speedups
GPU-powered numerical solvers reduce computational requirements
This enables more extensive parameter space exploration
Need for trust and acceptance from the astronomical community
Limited by simulation fidelity when modeling multi-scale processes and exposed to unknown systematics
Requires serious implementation efforts, not just conceptual hype
Develop benchmark datasets using simulations and real data, implement blind data analysis protocols
AI for Astronomy - Gaps and Opportunities
AI for Astronomy - Gaps and Opportunities
Better dark energy constraints ≠ solving the dark energy problem
Plenty of optimization but few surprising discoveries
We need rigorous benchmarking, not just conceptual hype
Multi-agent (large language models) systems, and their
reasoning capabilities, might offer high-risk, high-reward pathway
Astronomy for AI - Rich Datasets
Minimal ethical concerns or commercial constraints
Safe, low-risk ecosystem, with high-stakes science
Interesting domain shifts (systematics) between training and test sets, enables study of generalization under realistic constraints
Complex, non-proprietary data spanning large dynamic ranges
Astronomy for AI - Multimodal Challenges
Features unique modalities not in mainstream AI research -
e.g. foundational models for spectral analysis
Combines imaging, spectroscopy, time series, and theoretical models
Operating in a low signal-to-noise limit and complex/ heterogeneous noise characteristics requires advanced handling
Astronomy for AI - Physics-Informed Learning
Balances physical constraints with discovery potential
Ideal testing ground for incorporating physical laws
Drives innovation in encoding symmetries and conservation laws
Astronomy for AI - Scientific Literature
Exceptionally accessible through arXiv and NASA ADS
Well-curated with long time baselines
Accompanied by publicly available data and code
Multi-agent (large language models) systems for intersectional knowledge domains

NSF MPS Workshop
By Yuan-Sen Ting
NSF MPS Workshop
- 121